A record, not maintained. Every file here describes a chunk or a review as it was built, and much of it has been superseded since — a design replaced, an API renamed, a step done. Don’t build from it. What still holds is in the design docs (architecture.md, flows.md, privacy.md, keys-and-accounts.md, development.md), and what’s still open is in post-release-roadmap.md’s Owed and Kept in mind. They moved here from docs/plans/ on 2026-10-04, in the documentation review (chunk 22), when the owner decided plans/ holds live specs only.
Why keep them: the reasoning. A design doc says what the wallet does; the plan says why, what was tried first, and what the owner decided. Line numbers inside them are as of when each was written.
The code and the tests cite the reviews’ findings by ID about 800 times, and the design docs more, so these files are never renumbered or rewritten:
| Review | IDs | Cited as |
|---|---|---|
| crypto-review.md (2026-09-25) | its Not fixed list, by number | “crypto review, Not fixed #1” (#3 has three items under it) |
| launch-review.md (2026-09-26) | M1–M6, H1–H9, #10–#62; its Still open list, by number | “launch review #32”; “launch review, Still open #2” |
| the launch review’s second, adversarial round (2026-09-27) | <area>-<n>, areas sessions, lovejoin, money-submit, network-dapp, core-ui |
“final review sessions-1”. These are listed in no file: each fix commit names its IDs, so git log --grep='final review sessions-1' finds one. Not the same as the independent review’s Final review. |
| privacy-review.md (2026-09-27) | section numbers, §2.1–§6 | “privacy review §2.3”; tests/screens.test.ts names its tests by them |
| independent-review.md (2026-09-27/28) | H, M, L and D findings; its Final review, F1–F13 | “independent review M5” |